What’s wrong with contemporary economics?
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is argued that in educating economists we should sacri ce some of the more technical aspects of economics (which can be learned later), in favour of the compulsory inclusion of philosophy, political science, and economic history. Three reasons for these interdisciplinary studies are given. In the discussion of the place of mathematics in economics, fuzziness enters when symbols a, b, c are identi ed with individuals, rms, or farms. The identi cation of the clear cut symbol with the often ambiguous and fuzzy reality invites lack of precision and blurs the concepts. If the social sciences, including economics, are regarded as a ‘soft’ technology compared with the ‘hard’ technology of the natural sciences, development studies have come to be regarded as the soft underbelly of ‘economic science’. In development economics the important question is: what are the springs of development? We must confess that we cannot answer this question, that we do not know what causes successful development.
منابع مشابه
PUBLICS AND MARKETS What’s wrong with Neoliberalism?
Neoliberalism has become a key object of analysis in human geography in the last decade. Although the words neoliberal and neoliberalism have been around for a long while, it is only since the end of the 1990s that they have taken on the aura of grand theoretical terms. 'Neoliberalism' emerges as an object of conceptual and empirical reflection in the process of restoring to view a sense of pol...
متن کاملLaborism. The Economics Driven by Labor
Economics includes many strands of thought such as Marxism and monetarism, but one thread, in which work is the essence and the most important part of the debate, manifested in the very beginning of civilization and continues to the present day. Laborism is a term used today in circles dealing with socio-economic thought. In this paper, however, a modern laborism is presented as a compact, cohe...
متن کاملWhat’s Wrong with Contemporary Philosophy?
Analytic Philosophy (AP), although it comes in many varieties, has four striking properties. First, it is cultivated with every appearance of theoretical rigour. Second, its practitioners do not, by and large, believe that philosophy is or can be a science, i.e., they do not believe that it can add to the stock of positive human knowledge. Third, the philosophers who until very recently were th...
متن کاملQuestioning Astrophysics and Revealing Connections between Stellar Ignition , Luminous
Ours is a time of unparalleled richness in astronomical observations, but understanding seems to be absent throughout broad areas of astrophysics. Among some groups of astrophysicists there appears to be measured degrees of consensus, as indicated by the prevalence of so-called “standard models”, but in science consensus is nonsense; science is a logical process, not a democratic process, and l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005